<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paper and PDF Document Management for Word &#187; document management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/tag/document-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog</link>
	<description>A better way for document identification.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rubber Stamps Eliminated by Document Management Add-in for Microsoft® Word</title>
		<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/rubber-stamps-eliminated-by-document-management-add-in-for-microsoft%c2%ae-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/rubber-stamps-eliminated-by-document-management-add-in-for-microsoft%c2%ae-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber stamps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[StampIt® sets the new standard for document marking, identification and control and.replace the obsolete and ineffective<a href="http://www.stampitnet.com"> rubber stamp</a>,  By providing a convenient, easy-to-use and inexpensive resource for paper and electronic <a href="http://www.stampitnet.com/10Reasons.html">document management</a>, StampIt saves time, money and reduces the risks of unintended use.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/rubber-stamps-eliminated-by-document-management-add-in-for-microsoft%c2%ae-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printed Documents Not Being Protected in Europe.</title>
		<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/printed-documents-not-being-protected-in-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/printed-documents-not-being-protected-in-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/2009/06/17/printed-documents-not-being-protected-in-europe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive research from Samsung shows more than half the offices in Europe are not taking steps to protect confidential printed information Survey reveals low awareness of behavioural and IT security risks 17 June 2009, Chertsey, Surrey – Samsung Electronics, a leading name in the world of consumer electronics and information technology, has today released the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/printed-documents-not-being-protected-in-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Litigation Costs can be Reduced and Contained</title>
		<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/business-litigation-costs-can-be-reduced-and-contained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/business-litigation-costs-can-be-reduced-and-contained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document marking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proving the authenticity of an electronic document is much more difficult than doing so with paper. This is where unnecessary legal fees will be incurred. Discovery disputes consume vast amounts of resources, time and energy. If your entity is sorting through multiple copies of a document and there is a question as to what version is the original, the party that comes up with the signed, UNMARKED, paper document is going to have one big edge. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/business-litigation-costs-can-be-reduced-and-contained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word Users Don&#8217;t Need Rubber Stamps</title>
		<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document marking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber stamp alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signature stamps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old habits are hard to break — like the one of using rubber stamps to mark documents, particularly multiple copies of a document.  Hundreds of dollars per year can be saved by just eliminating one trip a day to a copy machine using an automated process.  Untold amounts can be saved by preventing a copy from becoming an “original.”  Further, establishing a policy of consistent marking of paper-based workflow provides a layer of security that is often omitted because of the inconvenience of application.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

