<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paper and PDF Document Management for Word &#187; automation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/tag/automation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog</link>
	<description>A better way for document identification.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Word Users Don&#8217;t Need Rubber Stamps</title>
		<link>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document marking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber stamp alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubber stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signature stamps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old habits are hard to break — like the one of using rubber stamps to mark documents, particularly multiple copies of a document.  Hundreds of dollars per year can be saved by just eliminating one trip a day to a copy machine using an automated process.  Untold amounts can be saved by preventing a copy from becoming an “original.”  Further, establishing a policy of consistent marking of paper-based workflow provides a layer of security that is often omitted because of the inconvenience of application.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stampitnet.com/Blog/word-users-dont-need-rubber-stamps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

